« April 2008 | Main | June 2008 »

May 2008

Secrets of Canadian Screenwriters video

May 27, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (0)

I made a video record of the panel discussion I moderated with fellow screenwriters Janet MacLean, Malcolm MacRury and Cal Coons on May 15 at the Library. It's just a static shot of the panel from about midway in the room, so it's not fancy, but you will get an account of what happened. One caveat, the memory card on the camera filled up at 90 minute mark, though the conversation kept going for another half an hour. So I'm sorry I couldn't get it all, but what's there is a terrific discussion about screenwriting from some of the top pros in the business in Canada.

Interview

May 23, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (0)

This link will take you to an interview with me for the North York Town Crier paper about my position as screenwriter-in-residence.

Thankfully, I'm quoted accurately!

Coverage

May 23, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (2)

If you do get your screenplay in the hands of a production company or broadcaster or studio willing to read it, it's unlikely that anyone you might want to meet there will read your script.

What they will read is the coverage.

Coverage is a document provided by a reader of your screenplay or TV project. It's usually 2 - 3 pages and gives the producer or broadcaster all the information they need to make a decision about your project. Who writes this incredibly important document? Probably the most junior person at the company or even someone who writes coverage piecemeal, for a fee for each script read. Without impressing this person, your script will never get a chance to impress anyone else!

The coverage will include the title and name of the writer. It will indicate the type of project and genre and then will give a brief synopsis. This synopsis will not outline every intricacy of your story, but the general action, important characters and tone of the script.

Finally, there will be some kind of analysis of the script that describes what works and what doesn't work. And there will be the "what to do with it" grid: the reader will check off one of usually 3 possibilities, Recommend (highest praise), Consider (next highest), or Pass (usual grade.) These 3 speak for themselves and it's safe to say that the reader is probably going to give out a recommend for maybe 1 in a 100 or maybe more scripts.

There's an old Hollywood saying, "I haven't read your script, but I have read the coverage." In fact, the coverage on your script could be more widely read and circulated--even between companies--than your script!

As part of my job in reading all the screenplays and TV scripts submitted to me as screenwriter-in-residence, I have been writing coverage on each project. It's usually pretty blunt, but I warn the writers who come to meet me about their script that I tried to write it with the same mindset as a typical reader who isn't trying to be supportive and who actually doesn't care whether your script gets made or not. Unfortunately, that's the reality you face in submitting material--in fact, consider yourself lucky if your script even gets covered!

I have to say all the writers I've met so far have been very accepting of the coverage I wrote--in fact some have even welcomed it. That's a real sign of professional maturity--learning not to take a reaction, whether negative or positive, personally. (This is something I'm STILL trying to learn!) Trying to see through the analysis and figure out what the person really felt. In fact, they may have misunderstood your script and suggested a wrong direction for you to go. In that case, ignore the solutions suggested, but try and figure out what the problem was using the coverage or someone's reaction as a clue. You need to be a creative detective, trying to get under the surface of a reaction and learn what's really going on. Because if you can do that, then you have a shot at rectifying whatever problem sent the script off the rails--at least as far as that person is concerned.

Or you may decide that it's better to ignore that negative reaction entirely!

In any case, if you do get access to your coverage, read it carefully AND with a grain of salt. The clues to fixing your script may lie in the coverage's pages--but you may also have ruined any chance of your script getting made due to bad coverage!

All this to say, the writers submitting scripts to me have a chance at getting free coverage and perhaps using that to focus a rewrite--before submitting their scripts to someone who could make or break their career.

Canadian Screenwriters rock!

May 16, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (2)

Img_2104

Thursday, May 15 at the Toronto Public Library.

Over 75 people turned out to hear 3 of Toronto's top screenwriters (pictured from my left, Janet MacLean, Malcolm MacRury and Cal Coons) respond to queries about their work and their creative process.

I was thrilled by the turnout and want to express my appreciation to the Library for sponsoring the event. I showed 14 clips from our collective body of work which were used to illustrate and illuminate some of the topics discussed: story, structure, character, theme and lots of insights on how these talented pros write and run the shows they produce.

If any of you were present, I'd love to hear what you thought. Please post a comment! (From what I read of the comment sheets attendees filled out, the evening was a success--but if there's something you would like me to explain further, let me know.)

Secrets of Canadian Screenwriters

May 15, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (0)

Thursday, May 15 at 7 PM, in the 2nd floor auditorium of the Toronto Public Library, 5120 Yonge Street, I'll be moderating a panel of Canada's finest screenwriters, Cal Coons, Malcolm MacRury and Janet MacLean. Collectively we have written many hours of film and TV and I'm excited to get all 3 of these talented pros in one place at one time.

I've planned an evening that focuses on craft:

What is a story?

The importance of structure and how to hold an audience

What makes a compelling character

How casting affects writing

Is it possible to have a common theme in your work when you write for series TV?

Being writers, we tell the best stories and are more articulate and entertaining than any other sector in the business. (Okay, I'm biased, but I've been to dinner with these people and it's a blast.)

All of us will be showing clips from our body of work and having put together the clips myself, I can promise you will be impressed by the sheer force of creativity in their work. You'll see clips from Murdoch Mysteries, The Border and Lives of the Saints among others. And Cal, Janet and Malcolm will be able to talk about what you're seeing. It's like the commentary track on a DVD--only live!

Malcolm will also be sneak previewing a teaser from his upcoming mini-series, ZOS, which has not been broadcast!

I'm hoping this will be an event that places screenwriting in the forefront of the creative process of film and television. After all, no director or producer or star even has a job until the screenwriter has finished theirs. It's time the screenwriter be acknowledged and I'm grateful to the Toronto Public Library for sponsoring this event.

Hope to see you there!

What before how

May 8, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (3)

Having settled into my position as the Library's first screenwriter-in-residence, I've begun reading the 44--a fantastic and daunting number--scripts that have been submitted.  And I've noticed a common problem.  It is a common problem because it's so fundamental and specific to film and TV writing. 

Screenwriting needs a strong story.

Remember that a screenplay can only describe what the audience sees and what they hear.  That's it.  It's a rather crude medium. 

The novelist can describe a character's feelings for pages--for the length of the novel even.  But the screenwriter has no such luxury.  If it can't be photographed or recorded, it can't be in the script.  Consequently, a screenwriter can't discover their story as they write--novelists often claim to have this drive them through their writing.  Screenwriters MUST have a clear idea of what their story is--whose story it is, what their goal is, who or what the obstacle to achieving that goal is and what is at stake.  And the stakes had better be close to life and death, even in comedy.

That kind of structural rigour can mean that the "quality" of the writing isn't in the beauty or poetry of the sentences.  It's in what the sentences ultimately describe.  It's the story that lies beneath the actual writing in the screenplay.  That's why writers who aren't particularly deft stylists can still be great screenwriters because their stories and their characters leap off the page--not only by how they write but by what they write.

This is a fundamental.  Screenwriters must determine WHAT before they determine HOW.  What happens?  Rhett Butler rejects Scarlet O'Hara.  That's an example of what.  That's the story's basic component.  This is WHAT happens. 

Notice that knowing what happens does not reveal in any way HOW Rhett rejects Scarlet.  (A lesser writer may decide that HOW Rhett does this is to say, "Frankly, hon, I just don't see this relationship going anywhere."  A better writer actually decided that HOW Rhett does this is to say, "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."  But in either case, the WHAT is consistent.)

Without knowing WHAT your story is doing, no amount of fancy writing matters.  "How" still matters, but only after you figure out the "what".

A Screenwriter's Book List

May 2, 2008 | Sugith Varughese | Comments (0)

If you wish to follow my suggestion to read screenplays in order to learn to write screenplays--or if you just wish to read them as a piece of writing--here's a list of ones I think will give you a good taste of what fine screenwriting can be.

You should be aware that screenplays are available either in published book form or downloadable from legitimate screenplay websites on the internet.   Most downloadable screenplays are free, some require payment and some are sites that will sell you hard copies of the original film or TV script that are then mailed to you once you've paid for them.

Here's a suggested list of PUBLISHED SCREENPLAYS--not in any particular order:

Three Films of Woody Allen - an interesting collection which includes Manhattan, co-written with Marshall Brickman.  These scripts are notable because Allen if he's writing alone or with a co-writer includes a lot of stage directions and parentheticals which most writers would not include and most actors and directors would resent reading.  It's kind of like directing on paper.  But since Allen is the director, I guess he doesn't care.  So read these for the story, the characters and the dialogue, but I wouldn't recommend following the format too closely if you want to write your own script.

Hannah and her Sisters - a wonderful screenplay, but with the same caveat as above.

Broadcast News - James L. Brooks is one of my heroes.  He began writing television in the 60's for shows like Room 222 and The Mary Tyler Moore Show.  He's a journeyman writer--like myself--and eventually found the means to write, produce and direct feature films.  I'm not a fan of his adaptations like Terms of Endearment--because I don't care for the original novel--but Broadcast News is a terrific screenplay.  It is also unconventional in that it focuses on three main characters, not one.  What it does so well is something all good screenplays should do:  take us into another world and show it to us authentically.  Brooks takes us inside the world of network news and reveals it to be funny, shallow and exciting.  His characters are so real and yet not everyday but original and eminently watchable.

Five Screenplays by Preston Sturges - the master of screwball, cynical comedy.  Again written as vehicles for him to direct, so don't follow his format.  They also use a very specific old Hollywood studio system format that is no longer used, so try and read through that and see the story and characters shining through.

William Goldman:  Four Screenplays - another master screenwriter famous for opining that "Nobody Knows Anything."  Except he knows how to write a terrific screenplay.  One of the giants.

The Shawshank Redemption - if you can--and as screenwriter Frank Darabont urges the reader to do in his introduction--read Stephen King's original novella first, then see how Darabont brilliantly adapts it to film.  But really, the credit must go to King first for his story.  Darabont was smart enough to know not to mess with it.

American Beauty - an original masterpiece by Alan Ball who went on to create a little TV show called Six Feet Under.  Won an Oscar and if you read it, you'll see why it deserved to.  You'll also notice that it differs significantly from the finished film and there's a huge lesson in that as well.

Sunset Boulevard - Billy Wilder is a god of the Hollywood film and this screenplay embodies the hallmarks of great screenwriting:  an original idea.  He also does what Brooks did with Broadcast News and that is take the reader/audience into a world they would not otherwise know: the demented mind of the silent film star played by silent film star Gloria Swanson.  I can't help believing that there's more truth than fiction to this.

Five Screenplays – Harold Pinter - For a master class in writing as poetry, read Pinter's scripts.  Perhaps the "leanest" screenwriting I've come across, he proves that a picture doesn't need a 1000 words.  A well-chosen ten is usually all Pinter needs.

Platoon/Salvador - Oliver Stone's diptych of Americans going mad in foreign wars of their own making is diametrically opposite to Pinter's sensibility.  Stone wears his heart on his sleeve and his writing explodes off the page.

A Neil Jordan Reader (includes screenplay for The Crying Game) - Neil Jordan was one of my teachers at the Canadian Film Centre, so there's a personal connection for me.  His script for The Crying Game is a revelation.  Originally titled The Soldier's Wife, apparently the revelation that Dil was really a man--hopefully you knew this!--didn't come until several drafts had been written!

Memento & Following - remarkable for the reverse order scene structure of Memento.  Following is his first screenplay, which apparently was shot over a couple of years on weekends.  Reading it, I realized you don't shirk on good writing just because you don't have the money to make the movie.

The English Patient (screenplay) - another personal connection for me, having attended the Canadian Film Centre with Michael Ondaatje who wrote the original novel and taught with the late Anthony Minghella who adapted it for the screen.  What's most remarkable for me is that Minghella claims that once he began work, he referred to numerous books on the desert, World War II, Africa--the one book he didn't refer to was the original novel!  I disagree with the direction he took in diminishing the Sikh sapper's story in his film version, but otherwise, he made dramatic what Ondaatje made poetic.

Best American Screenplays vol 1-3 ed. Sam Thomas - a set of American screenplays in 3 volumes that form a basis for understanding the form.  Too many important works to list here.  I cherish my copies as if they were the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The Apartment (in a collection with The Fortune Cookie) - A pair of Billy Wilder-I.A.L. Diamond comedic masterpieces.

Chinatown (available in collection with 2 other Towne screenplays) - Having taken a master class given by screenwriter Robert Towne, it's fascinating for me to see his personal sensibility infused in the writing of his classic screenplays.  However, credit must be given to director Roman Polanski for pushing the ending of Chinatown to the darker version we know from the film.

The Collected Works of Paddy Chayefsky, (4 volumes) - No one can write more passionately, no one clearly cared about his characters more than Chayefsky.  The fact that his scripts started as TV shows in the 50's is mindboggling given what usually passes for TV writing today.

A Fish Called Wanda - Written by John Cleese and Charles Crichton, this screenplay is incredibly lean in the writing and incredibly funny in the reading.

My Beautiful Laundrette and The Rainbow Sign by Hanif Kureishi - The vanguard of new British screenwriting.  I had written my first TV movie for CBC before this came out--a multi-racial romantic comedy and realized I'd been put to shame by Kureishi's groundbreaking and brave work.  Humbling for me and an inspiring piece of writing for anyone from a cultural background other than English or French who wishes to write about what they know.

There's plenty of other screenplays to read, of course.  This is really just a sample I culled from my own personal library.  Many will be out of print, but most are available at the Library.

If you haven't seen the films that these screenplays were made into, try not to!  Read the screenplay first, THEN screen the film.  It's going to give you a better idea of the power and responsibility the screenwriter must embrace in evoking a film that hasn't been made.  Then watching the film will reveal how much of the movie was actually on the page.  (Doing this will also demythologize the auteur theory that gives all the credit to the director!)

Enjoy these screenplays.  They're blueprints for movies that hadn't been made when they were written--and works of art in their own right.

About the Blog

Welcome to the Screenwriter in Residence Blog, where Sugith Varughese, the 2008 Toronto Public Library Screenwriter In Residence, discusses his craft and provides insights into what every budding screenwriter in Toronto needs to know.

Comments on this blog are now closed. Visit Sugith's regular blog, Building the Iceberg, for more screenwriting tips and updates on Sugith's activities.